« Have You Ever Seen a Commie Drink a Glass of Water? | Main | Agitprop Recommends »

November 15, 2005

Comments

Blogged on this and sent in a letter first thing this monring.

Makes feel all warm and gooey inside.

Mr. O'Reilly,

I can think of no higher honor than to have Blognonymous (https://blognonymous.com) added to your anti-military 'enemies' list.

Sincerely,

Kvatch

If everyone who thinks we were misled (quite a nice word for lying, no?)into the war in Iraq, and does not encourage terrorists to attack one of our beautiful cities, goes on Mr. O'Reilly's list, it will be very long indeed. Add mine, please.

Please add me to that list. O'Reilly is a pompous, self-serving windbag who is just plain stupid for painting a target on San Francisco.

What a big baby. Someone calls him on a stupid comment, and he starts building an enemies list. He's a spoiled child. What is this cretin doing on national television! Yuck!

I've been out of town, but I'm writing this one up tomorrow.

Dear Bill, could you possibly make certain I get a place right at or at least very near the top? But when are you going to start a draft dodger list? You could be right up there with Deacon Dumb, Dirty Dick and your dear friend Rush "Ican't go I've got a boil on my ass" Limpdick. Just think, star billing once again!

That visit to the rubber room just gets more inevitable.

Blogen:

Are you really the first one on the list?? ;)

Draft dodger list? What are you going to accuse him of next? Causing global warming perhaps? If you actually looked in Oreily's past he actually covered the news in a few combat zones. If you really want to start a list about draft dodgers how about start with slick willy?

Oh man I love this, can we get a list of folks who signed up? This is fantastic!

A badge of honor, I'm signing up right now...

Irritate that terrorist sympathizer and buy stuff on his boycott France list.

It would be an honor to be on such a list....I will take care of this first thing tomorrow....Maybe we could have yearly conventions in SF......and to the ass up above who thought Bill served in Combat zones- pissing in a public urinal at an airport does not count as Combat duty even if he hit the cake instead of his shoes....

Emailing that felafel-fetishizing bastard as we speak. You GO, Blogenfreud...

"and to the ass up above who thought Bill served in Combat zones- pissing in a public urinal at an airport does not count as Combat duty even if he hit the cake instead of his shoes...."

Wow what a completely ignorant and stupid thing to say. Yes it is completely impossible that Bill O'Reilly, a 20 year news veteran who has worked for ABC and NBC
as a correspondant and did some free lance journalism before that, never stepped foot in any combat zone. This is why liberal education systems do not work. It leaves retards like you out of touch with reality.

If you really want to start a list about draft dodgers how about start with slick willy?
Torm ... remember, this was 3 major election cycles ago. You and the rest of Wingnuttia have to move on ... you have to let go. Recall also that John Kerry volunteered and served in Vietnam. The Dear Leader has never even been to Vietnam, to defend us from a regiment of the Fifth Column or otherwise.

Are you really the first one on the list?? ;)
I can dream, can't I?

I want to be on the list. Fox needs to take a shower and get rid of the BO covering the network.

John Kerry was an attention whoring piece of shit. He served in Vietnam for 4 months before he ran away like a little baby. Every other soldiers serves for 1 year. The wounds that he suffered to get out were all self inflicted due to his own stupidity. He abandoned his men and then betrayed them. You tell me to let go of Bill Clinton but you fucking liberals can't let go of Vietnam. Every damn speech that Kerry made he mentioned Vietnam in it. Hey asshole how about you let go of something that happened before you were fucking born before you start giving me advice.

PS. Bill Clinton is still politically active and is therefore still fair game. So fuck off.

O'Reilly is a disingenuous whore. He is just "critical" enough of the Bush administration to barely maintain some plausible claim to his manufactured image as a hard-hitting independent.

But the funny thing is, all his "criticisms" of Bush adhere so closely to the administration's talking points they could have been written by Karl Rove.

For example, O'Reilly tried to bolster his street cred as a "rugged independent" by saying the administration had been taken in by bad intelligence from the CIA. There you have it! No stovepiping of intelligence, no OSP, no manipulation of public perceptions by the neocons around Rummy and the Prince of Darkness--Bushco was just the passive victim of those bad old CIA intelligence analysts!

O'Reilly isn't stupid--or if he is, it's only reflected in his clumsy floundering around after he gets caught. He's a deliberate and self-conscious bukkakist of those in power.

Who plays with a vibrator while on the phone?
Spongebill Loofahands!

The fake populist on the Talking Points Zone--
Spongebill Loofahands!

A loud splotchy bully who hollers "SHUT UP!"
Spongebill Loofahands!

He drinks Karl Rove's semen straight out of a cup.
Spongebill Loofah-hands!

Spongebill Loofahands!
Spongebill Loofahands!
Spongebill Loofahands!
Spongebill...
Loofahands!

O'Reilly is a disingenuous whore. ...
Kevin, that is a Class A rant ... I am honored to have it on this blog.

Thanks, blogenfreude.

O'Reilly's also, I think, a good managerialist, corporate liberal from the FDR-Truman days, when "the folks" in Levittown learned the accepted version of American history in the government schools, and generally let their lives be managed efficiently by the "proper authorities."

This comes through loud and clear in his resentment of "crazy websites" that are "allowed to say anything they want," circumventing the previous gatekeeper role of professional journalists. O'Reilly, for all his fake populist pretensions, is much more comfortable in a world where media worked in one direction, than in a world where the audience can talk back (or worse yet, talk to each other about him). It's a "Cluetrain" world, and O'Reilly's still pining away for the days when everybody tuned in to Cronkite to be told "the way it is."

"corporate liberal from the FDR-Truman days, when "the folks" in Levittown learned the accepted version of American history in the government schools, and generally let their lives be managed efficiently by the "proper authorities."

O there it is, the conspiracy theory. Yes because our schools don't teach proper American history right? They are all lies and coverups orchestrated by "THE MAN" to fool us ordinary joe schmoes in to keeping in line. Yes its all a conspiracy by the government, the corporations, and the media to keep you from getting any ideas of your own. Am i on the right track? You seem to love to exercise your right to free speech, but when O'reilly exercises his all you nut job commies come out of the wood work and want his blood and his job. Give me a break whacko.

"Everybody is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people’s idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone says anything back, that is an outrage." ~Sir Winston Churchill

You seem to love to exercise your right to free speech, but when O'reilly exercises his all you nut job commies come out of the wood work and want his blood and his job.
Free speech is fine. But when you call for jihad against a major American city, it's like yelling "Fire!" in the proverbial crowded theater. It's also arguably against the law. Besides, stating your opinion that someone should be fired is free speech too, non?
Torm, we at Agitprop need higher-quality trolls. Got any friends?

I'm in ... just sent this:

Dear Mr. O'Reilly--
It was with much joy that I noticed you had come up with a list of "smear sites.” From what I can tell, is a list of blogs and other such places that your folks find on Google by typing in "George Bush is a failure." This is important work -- after all, it is vital for Fox News to continue questioning the patriotism of those who disagree with the government. As we all know, having an independent thought can be traitorous, and it is important to squelch those who oppose.

It is because of this that I ask for you to add www.thoushallnotsuck.com to your list. I can promise you that its proprietor is decidedly against a war built on lies, torture, widespread corruption, and other such traditional American values that Republicans hold so dear.

Thanks!

God bless you, and God bless America!

P.S. I hear you are looking for some new interns -- where should I send my resume?

Bill Clinton dodged the draft so he could smoke pot in London. He is also a rapist and a murderer who lied and obstructed justice. The hard work of Richard Mellon Scaife's Arkansas Project proved this.

John Kerry clearly shot himself in Vietnam so that he could claim he was a wounded war hero 35 years later when he ran for president. The Swift Boat Vets proved this without a doubt in their brave PR campaign last year.

This means that all Democrats hate America.

...

Yo B-Freude, if you want more intelligent trolls then I would suggest you don't leave comments here...it can be fun though

Saying that bill oreilly called for jihad on san fran is ridiculous. Its called sattire and if you don't understand it then you need to go get a dictionary. Why is it that when oreilly says this however you guys get all pissy but when faggot college kids are posting that American troops should die and that america deserved 9/11 all over their websites you say nothing. Where were you when Ward Churchill was saying that America deserved 9/11 and that he thinks our troops deserve to die? Did any of you post anything about this on your blogs? No you didn't. Why because you're a bunch of sleezy scumbag liberals who secretly sympathize with his point of view. And you specifically target oreilly because he's a popular conservative. Had a liberal made similar statements to oreillys you would not have given it a second thought.

Where were you when Ward Churchill was saying that America deserved 9/11 and that he thinks our troops deserve to die? Did any of you post anything about this on your blogs? No you didn't.

Yes I did. Here's my post from 02/26/2005 titled "Little Eichmanns":

Blowback, not the white stuff blowing into the back of your nose, but a political term, has become quite pertinent these days. Professor Ward Churchill wrote regarding the 9/11 victims in his work “Some People Push Back/On the Justice of Roosting Chickens”:

They were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America's global financial empire--the "mighty engine of profit" to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved and they did so both willingly and knowingly. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it.

Now I understand his point. The terrorists hit the WTC and the Pentagon because those are the centers and symbols of American economic and military power. The Islamic Jihadis committed these attacks due to their hatred for America and everything it stands for--mainly the United States reckless and self-serving foreign policy which supports evil dictatorial regimes in the Middle East, starts wars when it wants to for oil profits and allows the starvation deaths of children, etc…American actions in the Middle East have led to a violent response by the terrorists.

Perfect example of blowback: CIA funds and trains Bin Laden in 1980’s in Soviet-Afghan war, then Bin Laden turns on U.S. in 1990’s and architects the 9/11 attacks. Did they expect that one? Well you can’t expect to be the big bully all the time without having your subjects strike back occasionally, I guess. That’s just common sense, something our shortsighted government lacks.

Now back to Churchill. Comparing some little stockbroker who worked in the WTC to Adolf Eichmann is quite a stretch to say the least. Eichmann oversaw the systematic extermination of Jews during the Nazi holocaust helping to direct Jews to concentration camps to meet the Final Solution. While Eichmann never personally committed the murders, he oversaw the bureaucratic network that resulted in millions of deaths. The stockbroker is no Eichmann. Neither is the guy who writes his check. Churchill seems to have gone off the deep end into some sort of lunacy. His argument was good for the most part until he denigrated the innocent lives lost on 9/11 by calling them Eichmanns. Yes he has the right to say this (freedom of speech) but his logic is pretty cruel (freedom to put your foot in your mouth?).

Well to say the least this provided perfect fodder for right-wing pundits (O’Reilly and Hannity) to scream about. The media dug these writings up three years after they were written. Churchill faced blowback first-hand when he lost his position as chair of the Ethnic Studies department. Now the Colorado governor is forcing him to resign altogether from the University of Colorado. Maybe he’ll learn to be more careful next time he writes something callous like that again.

In other words, blowback's a bitch.

Wow that's nice all you've done is shown that you sympathize with him just as i said you did.

"mainly the United States reckless and self-serving foreign policy which supports evil dictatorial regimes in the Middle East, starts wars when it wants to for oil profits and allows the starvation deaths of children, etc…American actions in the Middle East have led to a violent response by the terrorists. "

Yes validate their attacks on innocent. Would you be saying the same thing if your son or wife (or perhaps your boyfriend) had been in those buildings. There is no justification for killing 3000 people stop trying to make one.

"His argument was good for the most part until he denigrated the innocent lives lost on 9/11 by calling them Eichmanns."

So in other words just keep your insanity to yourself and everything is good? Ward Churchill is not a uncommon type of person on the looney left. You should have expressed outrage in your post. Did you? No. You express regret because you see that this potential ally is now going to lose all credibility and is going to be roasted. So sad for you.

You just don't get it do you, Torm? Have you even bothered to read Churchill's piece or do you just repeat the talking points from O'Reilly and Hannity? If you actually read Churchill's piece then you would realize that my second paragraph was summarizing his main argument.

Yes validate their attacks on innocent.

His argument about why the terrorists attacked is valid. That is the concept of blowback which I described (funding Bin Laden and Saddam in the 80's, etc.) However, I never said that the attack on innocent civilians was justified. Churchill makes that argument, not I. That is why I take issue with him calling the 9/11 victims "Little Eichmanns".

So in other words just keep your insanity to yourself and everything is good?

I agree with people keeping their insanity to themselves. On the other hand, you seem to want the thought police to patrol everyone's minds. Individuals have the ability to think whatever thoughts they may like, however, they should be prudent when sharing those thoughts with the external world. In Churchill's case he shouldn't have denigrated the innocent lives lost on 9/11 by saying they deserved it--because they did not deserve it. I believe that the consequences he faced (losing his chair of the department) were justified.

If that doesn't get through that thick head of yours then I don't know what will. Or perhaps it was too nuanced for you to comprehend...

You GO Agi!! Way to shut up that ignorant troll. Man, he is angry, eh? Even using the word "faggot" to make sure all his bigotry shows. Once I see that, I tend to stop reading, BTW, Torm. I mean, once you start calling people "faggots," You sound like Fred Phelps and we all know what an insane whackjob he is.

Nice try, though, Torm, although you can't come close to keeping up with Blogenfreude or Agi, obviously, without resorting to blowing up and getting defensive, much like Bill O'Reilly. IN fact, you've made this comment section pretty rich with irony, acting so like Bill. Was that your intent? If so, it's the only smart thing you displayed up here.

Its called sattire [sic] and if you don't understand it then you need to go get a dictionary.

Main Entry: sat·ire
Pronunciation: 'sa-"tIr
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin satura, satira, perhaps from (lanx) satura dish of mixed ingredients, from feminine of satur well-fed; akin to Latin satis enough -- more at SAD
1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly.

Now Torm, what it witty, ironic, or sarcastic about telling citizens in no uncertain terms that they should be left to die in the event of a terrorist attack? Don't make me throw a dictionary at you again!

Please Mr. O'Reilly - can we Canadians get on your list. We really are Canuckistan, honest! We have universal healthcare too. We even refused to join the Iraq war. Put us all on the list... please.

Thank you guys.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/admin/search/google?keywords=site%3Aforumlivre.com%20biagra
buy biagra [url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/admin/search/google?keywords=site%3Aforumlivre.com%20biagra]buy biagra[/url]

The comments to this entry are closed.

We Believe in Nothing

Consortium

Ye Olde Blogroll

Crass Commercialism

  • Find Zylotrim Reviewed

December 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Categories

Blogilicious

Blog powered by Typepad