Vitter's Little Problem
Come to find out that Vitter hooker Wendy Cortez/Yow/Ellis is giving interviews, from which we learn, among other things:
- She is positive it was David Vitter, and was asked about that twice on the lie detector test she took. Both times her answers passed the test.
- She says it was not hard to remember him because she "didn't have a crap-load of clients".
- Once the relationship ended, when he learned her name was the same as his wife's, he still frequented the club where she was a dancer. He would "just sit there and stare". It creeped her out. Can't imagine why.
- He left her with no mementos or business cards, but when asked, she said he did have one thing to remember him by: An identifying characteristic, if you will. To quote, "It was just a little something." (Wendy's emphasis, not mine)
Agitprop and Your Right Hand Thief are determined to keep this story alive. Come back soon.
AP photo by Ric Francis.
I'd say Vitter has a lot of "little" problems and the hooker is probably the least of them. I'm confused as to why he'd cop to one hooker, but not another.
Oh well, it's not like he's well known for his intellectual powers.
Posted by: Omnipotent Poobah | September 15, 2007 at 10:24 AM
so I have a question,do the Repugs have sexual deviancy issues?...and when they fall out of the closet it is not because they were having just an affair, is it always Something, even a "little something" that is a little out of the ordinary....totally creepy...
Posted by: enigma4ever | September 15, 2007 at 11:37 AM
"little something" does this refer to what was in the diaper?
Posted by: mandt | September 15, 2007 at 02:09 PM
You make sure you stay on top of Vitter, Freude!
"Little something"...see this is why Democrats don't have sex scandals until they are President. We're too well hung for women to blab about and risk losing...
Posted by: actor212 | September 15, 2007 at 02:32 PM
She looks like she's about to cry...I wonder if I could comfort her?
Posted by: actor212 | September 15, 2007 at 02:33 PM
Lie-detectors are worthless.
Posted by: Salvor Hardin | September 15, 2007 at 10:46 PM
Not at all, Salvor. Police departments across the country use them to eliminate suspects. They're not admissible in court, but that doesn't mean they aren't accurate enough for this purpose.
Posted by: actor212 | September 16, 2007 at 09:15 AM
This one goes out to Senator Pampers!
Posted by: Comandante Agi | September 18, 2007 at 06:33 PM