Not Guilty

April 25, 2008

Discuss.

Detectives Charged in Sean Bell Shooting Acquitted on All Counts [NY1]

Comments

If that happened here in SoCal there'd be another riot.

Posted by: Agi | April 25, 2008 at 04:29 PM

How many times does this have to happen in New York, before SOMETHING happens to the people in charge there?

How many times are there going to be acquittals in cases like this.

Bullshit.

Posted by: tafka pusboy | April 25, 2008 at 06:04 PM

NYC is a perpetual test case for chaos theory. Also, as can be seen from the photo here, Mr. Bell is (sorry, was) a very unsmiling person. No wonder the heavily armed plainclothes and undercover cops felt so threatened.

Moreover, the reason there were all those heavily armed plainclothes and undercover cops in the vicinity was DRUGS, DRUGS, DRUGS, or at least SUSPECTED DRUGS, DRUGS, DRUGS.

Mr. Bell was just an unfortunate, unsmiling piece of collateral damage in the bogus war on drugs. Had this been Baghdad instead of NYC and Mr. Bell had been an Iraqi instead of an American, he would have been just an unfortunate, unsmiling piece of collateral damage in the bogus war on terrorism.

Posted by: Grace Nearing | April 25, 2008 at 06:26 PM

Gives new meaning to the term "Cop Killer."

Posted by: mandt | April 26, 2008 at 01:07 PM

So how much money did the judge get from the cops to make that verdict?

Posted by: Magical Shrimp | April 26, 2008 at 01:43 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Crass Commercialism